The community perspective in public policy
meaning, potentials, and challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20856161Keywords:
communitarianism, public policy, social cohesion, resilience, democracyAbstract
This article analyzes the relevance of the community perspective in public policy within a global context marked by profound geopolitical transformations, accelerated technological advances, the climate emergency, and the decline of liberal democracies. Contrary to the idea that global challenges require exclusively state or international responses, it is argued that the community approach is not only relevant but essential. The central thesis proposes that its incorporation strengthens social cohesion, improves the capacity to address complex problems, and contributes to the democratic quality of public policies. The study illustrates these contributions through two concrete fields: health promotion and climate resilience, where collective action based on territorial proximity allows for more effective and contextualized responses. Likewise, it highlights the role of local governments as spaces for innovation and democratic resistance. However, the article also warns about the limits of the community approach, especially through the so-called “triple trap” (local, community, and participatory), which can lead to inefficiency, exclusion, or the reproduction of inequalities if not adopted critically. In conclusion, it proposes understanding the community perspective as a transversal logic capable of articulating the local and the global to comprehensively address some of the major contemporary challenges.
References
ANSELL, Chris; GASH, Alison. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 18, n. 4, p. 543-571, out. 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
BAIOCCHI, Gianpaolo; GANUZA, Ernesto. Popular democracy: the paradox of participation. California: Stanford University Press, 2016.
BARBIERI, Nicolás et al. Measuring and analysing community action for health: an indicator-based typology and its application to the case of Barcelona. Social Indicators Research, New York, v. 139 n. 1, p. 25-45, Jul. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-017-1703-4. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-017-1703-4. Acesso em: 28 maio 2026.
BARNES, Marian; NEWMAN, Janet; SULLIVAN, Helen. Power, participation and political renewal: case studies in public participation. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2007. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt9qgrqs.
BLANCO, Ismael et al. El papel de la innovación social frente a la crisis. Ciudad y Tterritorio. Estudios Territoriales, Madrid, v. 48, n. 188, 249-260, June 2016. Disponível em: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/CyTET/article/view/76478. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
BLANCO, Ismael; GOMÀ CARMONA, Ricard; SUBIRATS, Joan. El nuevo municipalismo: derecho a la ciudad y comunes urbanos. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, Madrid, n. 20, p. 14-28, nov. 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.24965/GAPP.V0I20.10491. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
BLANCO, Ismael; GOMÀ, Ricard. La crisis del modelode gobierno tradicional: reflexiones en torno a la governance participativa y de proximidad. Gestión y Política Pública, Ciudad de México, v. 12, n. 1, p. 5-42, jan. 2003. Disponível em: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/133/13312101.pdf. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. The forms of capital. In: GRANOVETTER, Mark; SWEDBERG, Richard (org.). The Sociology of Economic Life. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2018. p. 78-92.
BOVAIRD, Tony et al. Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy, Cambridge, v. 44, n. 1, p. 1-23, June 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000567. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
BOVAIRD, Tony. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 67, n. 5, p. 846-860, set. 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
BRIGGS, Xavier de Souza. Democracy as problem solving: civic capacity in communities across the globe. Cambridge: MIT Press Scholarship Online, 2008. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026413.001.0001.
BRUGUÉ TORRUELLA, Quim et al. ¿Inteligencia administrativa para abordar "problemas malditos"?: el caso de las comisiones interdepartamentales. Gestión y Política Pública, Ciudad de México, v. 24, n. 1, p. 85-130, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-10792015000100003&lng=pt&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
BRUGUÉ TORRUELLA, Quim. La dimensión democrática de la nueva gestión pública. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, Madrid, n. 5-6, p. 45-58, ago. 1996. Disponível em: https://revistasonline.inap.es/index.php/GAPP/article/view/66. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
BRUGUÉ TORRUELLA, Quim. Modernizar la administración desde la izquierda: burocracia, nueva gestión pública y administración deliberativa. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, Caracas, n. 29, p. 27-56, June 2004.
BRUGUÉ TORRUELLA, Quim. Organizaciones que saben, organizaciones que aprenden. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, 2022.
CHRISTENSE, Karen S. Cities and complexity: making intergovernmental decisions. London: Sage Publications, 1999.
DABAN, Ferran et al. Barcelona salut als barris: twelve years' experience of tackling social health inequalities through community-based interventions. Gaceta sanitaria, [s.l.], v. 35, n. 3, p. 282-288, June 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.02.007. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911120300704?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
DAHLGREN, Göran; WHITEHEAD, Margaret. The dahlgren-whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows. Public Health, London, v. 199, p. 20-24, out. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.009. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335062100336X?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
DENHARDT, Janet V.; DENHARDT, Robert B. The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 75, n. 5, p. 664-672, fev. 2015. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12347.
DENHARDT, Janet V.; DENHARDT, Robert B. The new public service: serving, not steering. New York: Routledge, 2003.
DUNLEAVY, Patrick; HOOD, Christopher. From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, London, v. 14, n. 3, p. 9-16, jan. 1994. DOI: 10.1080/09540969409387823.
FOLLECO CHALÁ, Johnson Marcelo; LEGARDA SEVILLA, Mónica Alejandra. La administración pública: descenso de la burocracia, la nueva gestión pública y gobernanza en América Latina. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science, [s.l.], v. 3, n. 10, p. 91-106, out. 2020.
HEAD, Brian W. Wicked problems in public policy: understanding and responding to complex challenges. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.
HECKSCHER, Charles. Defining the post-bureaucratic type. In: GODWYN, Mary Ellen; GITTELL, Jody Hoffer (org.). Sociology of organizations: structures and relationships. London: Sage Publications, 2011. p. 98-106.
HOOGENDIJK, Emiel O. et al. Frailty combined with loneliness or social isolation: an elevated risk for mortality in later life. Journal of The American Geriatrics Society, Massachusetts, v. 68, n. 11, p. 2587-2593, jul. 2020. Disponível em: https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.16716. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
HUGHES, Owen E. Public management and administration. 5 rd ed. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017.
KLINENBERG, Eric. Heat wave: a social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. 2 rded. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
KLINENBERG, Eric. Palaces for the people: how to build a more equal and united society. London: Bodley Head, 2018.
LATHAM, Alan; LAYTON, Jack. Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass, London, v. 13, n. 7, e12444, July 2019. Disponível em: https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12444. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
MOURE-PEÑÍN, Leire. Policrisis y riesgos globales en relaciones internacionales: una aproximación desde la complejidad y los sistemas adaptativos complejos. Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, Pamplona, v. 40, p. 155-197, abr. 2024. DOI: 10.15581/010.40.155-197. Disponível em: https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/anuario-esp-dcho-internacional/article/view/45925. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
NUSSIO, Enzo. The “dark side” of community ties: collective action and lynching in México. American Sociological Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 89, n. 4, p. 708-734, June 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224241253268. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
OLSEN, Johan P. Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 16, n. 1, p.1-24, jan. 2006. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui027. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/16/1/1/886936. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
OSBORNE, David; GAEBLER, Ted. Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1992.
OSBORNE, David; PLASTRIK, Peter. Banishing bureaucracy: the five strategies for reinventing government. New York: A Plume Book, 1998.
PARÉS, Marc; BLANCO, Ismael; FERNÁNDEZ, Charlotte. Facing the great recession in deprived urban areas: how civic capacity contributes to neighborhood resilience. City & Community, London, v. 17, n. 1, p. 65-86, mar. 2018. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/cico.12287. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
PASARÍN, M. Isabel; DÍEZ, Elia. Salud comunitaria: una actuación necesaria. Gaceta Sanitaria, Madrid, v. 27, n. 6, p. 477-478, 2013.
PERRY, James L. Democracy and the new public service. The American Review of Public Administration, California, v. 37, n. 1, p. 3-16, mar. 2007. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0275074006296091. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
PETERS, B. Guy. The politics of bureaucracy: an introduction to comparative public administration. 7rded. New York: Routledge, 2018. DOI: 10.4324/9781315813653.
PITARCH GARRIDO, María Dolores et al. Comunicación, educación, participación y resiliencia socio-territorial. In: CAMARASA-BELMONTE, Ana Maria; ROMERO GONZÁLES, Juan (org.). Cambio climático y territorio en el Mediterráneo Ibérico: efectos, estrategias y políticas. Valência: Tirant Humanidades, 2025. p. 333-362.
POLLITT, Christopher; THIEL, Sandra; HOMBURG, Vicent (org.). New public management in Europe: adaptation and alternatives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. DOI: 10.1057/9780230625365.
PORTELA, Marta et al. Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: a new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, Dordrecht, v. 114, n. 2, p. 493-511, nov. 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0158-x. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
PURCELL, Mark. Urban democracy and the local trap. Urban Studies, London, v. 43, n. 11, p. 1921-1941, out. 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600897826. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
PUTNAM, Robert D. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
REBOLLO IZQUIERDO, José Oscar. La transformación social urbana: la acción comunitaria en la ciudad globalizada. Gestión y Política Pública, Ciudad de México, v. 21, p. 159-186, 2012. Número especial. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-10792012000300005&lng=pt&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
REBOLLO IZQUIERDO, José Oscar; MORALES, Enersto. Hacia una política pública de acción comunitaria. In: OLIVEIRAS, Ramon Canal (org.). Ciudades y pueblos que pueden durar: políticas locales para una nueva época. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial, 2013. p. 303-316.
RHODES, Roderick Arthur William. The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies, London, v. 44, n. 4, p. 652-667, set. 1996. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x.
RYFF, Carol D.; SINGER, Burton (org.). Emotion, social relationships, and health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. DOI: 110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195145410.001.0001.
SIMONE, AbdouMaliq. People as infrastructure: intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, Durham, v. 16, n. 3, p. 407-429, set. 2004. Disponível em: https://read.dukeupress.edu/public-culture/article-abstract/16/3/407/31780/People-as-Infrastructure-Intersecting-Fragments-in?redirectedFrom=fulltext. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
SOBRINO-GARCÉS, Cristina; MURRIÁ SANGENÍS, Marta (org.). Barrios y políticas públicas de seguridad. Revista Papers, BellaTerra, n. 67, p. 1-224, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.institutmetropoli.cat/es/revistapapers/n-67-barrios-y-politicas-publicas-de-seguridad/. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
SOJA, Edward W. Seeking spatial justice. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
SØRENSEN, Eva; TORFING, Jacob. Theoretical approaches to democratic network governance. In: SØRENSEN, Eva; TORFING, Jacob (org.). Theories of democratic network governance, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. p. 233-246. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230625006_14. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
STOKER, Gerry. Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, v. 36, n. 1, p. 41-57, 2006.
STONE, Clarence N. Civic capacity and urban education. Urban Affairs Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 36, n. 5, p. 595-619, 2001b. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10780870122185019. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
STONE, Clarence N.; HENING, Jeffrey R.; JONES, Bryan D.; PIERANNUNZI, Carol. Building civic capacity: the politics of reforming urban schools. Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 2001a.
SUBIRATS, Joan. El poder de lo próximo: las virtudes del municipalismo. Madrid: Catarata, 2023.
SVAMPA, Maristella. Policrisis: cómo enfrentar el vaciamiento de las izquierdas y la expansión de las derechas autoritarias. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores Argentina, 2025.
TAM, Henry. Communitarianism: politics, society and public policy. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2025.
TARRAGÓ SANFELIU, Daniel; BRUGUÉ TORRUELLA, Quim. La administración deliberativa: de la eficacia y la eficiencia a la inteligencia, y de la burocracia a la innovación. Brasília, DF: Cepal Brasil/Ipea, 2015. (Textos para discussão Cepal/Ipea, 58). Disponível em: https://portalantigo.ipea.gov.br/agencia/images/stories/PDFs/TDs_Ipea_Cepal/tdcepal_058.pdf. Acesso em: 28 maio 2026.
TAYLOR, Marilyn. Public policy in the community. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011.
TRONTO, Joan C. Caring democracy: markets, equality, and justice. New York: New York University Press, 2013.
UMBERSON, Debra; MONTEZ, Jennifer Karas. Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Washington, v. 51, n. 1, p. 54-66, out. 2010. Suplemento. DOI: 10.1177/0022146510383501. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022146510383501. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
VIGODA-GADOT, Eran. New public management. In: RABIN, Jack (ed.). Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2003.
WAGENAAR, Hendrik. Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: how citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighborhood decline. The American Review of Public Administration, London, v. 37, n. 1, p. 17-50, mar. 2007. DOI: 10.1177/0275074006296208. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0275074006296208. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
YANJIE, Bian; LEI, Zhang; YAYI, Gao. Social bonding and subjective wellbeing: findings from the 2017 ISSP module. International Journal of Sociology, London, v. 50, n. 1, p. 26-47, dez. 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2019.1701320. Acesso em: 21 maio 2026.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ismael Blanco

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




